Fighting for freedom of (or from) religion

July 9, 2008

Army Spc. Jeremy Hall doesn’t mind putting his life at risk to protect his country. What he does mind is having religious beliefs pushed on him by the government — and being punished for his lack of faith.

That’s why he filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, among others, claiming that his First Amendment right to religious freedom had been violated.

According to CNN, Hall, a former Baptist-turned-atheist, claims that the military discriminates against non-Christians. Unlike most plaintiffs, Hall isn’t asking for money. Instead, he wants the military to guarantee religious freedom for all soldiers.

What do you think? Should the military be allowed to encourage religious exercise and accommodate religion, or does the First Amendment prohibit any commingling of church and state?

CHRISTINA DORAN, Assistant Legal Editor

Sphere: Related Content

Maryland, helping military leave

May 22, 2008

Most of the talk about military families in Maryland these days has to do with making it easier for people to move here with their jobs as part of the Base Realignment and Closure process. But Gov. Martin O’Malley took a step Thursday that could also make things easier for military families who have to move away.

At his final bill signing, O’Malley signed a bill that would make people eligible for unemployment benefits if they quit a job to follow a spouse in the military. Typically, unemployment insurance is not available to people who leave jobs by choice, but this will be a new exception in state law.

Potentially, these unemployment claims could raise premiums for some businesses that otherwise wouldn’t have seen former employees collect benefits, but on the whole it’s likely to have a small effect on the state’s unemployment system. According to the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, more than 300 people in the state were unable to collect benefits after following a military spouse in fiscal 2007.

ANDY ROSEN, Business Writer

Sphere: Related Content

Army veterinarian from Maryland treats Iraqi donkeys

April 13, 2008

An Iraqi industrial complex has quadrupled its productivity in the last three months, and it has an Army veterinarian from Maryland to thank.

When heavy fuel oil became available to fire the kilns at the Narhwan Brick Factory Complex in Iraq, employment rose from 3,500 to 15,000, according to the Dept. of Defense.

But Army economist Lt. Col. Bruce Baker realized that healthy donkeys were needed for production at full capacity (to haul the fuel oil, straw and mud, without motor vehicles). And the animals on hand were sick and weak.

That’s where Capt. Rory Carolan, of Maryland, came in.

Carolan specializes in treating equine species such as horses, ponies and, indeed, donkeys. After arriving in Narhwan, Carolan held a clinic and treated more than 250.

“Many of the donkeys were malnourished and obviously mistreated,” he told the DOD. “Some suffered from pressure sores, hematomas and neglect. Some collapsed of exhaustion and died before our eyes.”

So, with the help of other soldiers, Carolan examined, wormed, measured and weighed the donkeys.

“That is where we can have the most impact, teaching the owners how to properly feed and care for the animals. Higher production at the factories will be achieved with the improved standards of care employed.”

JACKIE SAUTER, Web Editor

Sphere: Related Content

Video: Pentagon says spy satellite shot down

February 21, 2008

pentagon_brief.jpg

LiveLeak has the video of the Pentagon briefing where General Cartwright, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff discussed his “high level of confidence” that the rogue spy satellite has been destroyed. Video of the missile launch and “interception” with the satellite is included.

The Kaboom blog says:

While they can’t confirm completely the destruction of the tank, which was needed to release the toxic fuel that may have posed a danger to us Earthlings, the Pentagon has declared the mission a complete success and with good reason.

JACKIE SAUTER, Web Editor

Sphere: Related Content

Coast Guard leaves FOIA out at sea

September 11, 2007

Unlucky boaters and ice fishers of the world, take heart: Apparently the Coast Guard believes that its rescue duties encompass the duty to save you from embarrassment.

Journalistic watchdogs over at the Poynter Institute report that the Coast Guard is withholding names of people it has rescued.

It embarked on the policy after the Cleveland Plain Dealer sought the names to determine if, as rumor had it, the Guard was rescuing serial offenders – specifically, people who put themselves in peril while ice fishing each year. (It should be noted that the Coast Guard first held a TWO-YEAR review).

One might think that the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) should cover this information, or that civilian rescue records aren’t privy to medical privacy laws.

But Poynter quotes a Navy Times’ story on the new policy:
The Coast Guard believes the names of individuals rescued are protected under a FOIA exemption that prohibits disclosures that “constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.”
What do you think? Is this the sort of peril from which the government should protect those it serves?
Anyone out there have any experience dealing with FOIA and the Coast Guard or military?
-JACKIE SAUTER, Multimedia Editor
Sphere: Related Content

  • Law

  • Business

  • Archives

  • Visit Eye on Annapolis

    Check out our blog on the legislative session, Eye on Annapolis.
  • Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Lou Fritz: Robbie Whelan’s, There Stands Brody Like A Stonewall, is typical of journalists who are long on...
  • Donald S. Smith: I find it interesting that those who claim to love freedom the most are sometimes the quickest to...
  • Steve: Robbie, Your ignorance is deafening.
  • Rich Barnett: Are you really able to write this story and end it with “one of the state’s most...
  • Winger: Well, let’s look at a list: 1.) Baltimore is situated below the Mason / Dixon line. 2.) The battery on...

On Commenting

We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.

Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.