Prospective Kelly jurors say the darndest things
May 16, 2008
The Chicago Tribune ran a story the other day on jury selection in the R. Kelly child pornography trial, cataloguing the reasons why prospective jurors were not picked. Among the highlights:
- Two people (the reporter doesn’t say what gender they were, but shall we guess?) opined that if they were in charge, they would lower the age of consent. One said that “nature” already has an age of consent: “puberty.”
- One lady proclaimed Kelly a “musical genius.”
- One man said, “R. Kelly may have led the Taliban in attacking us on 9-11, but you can’t prove it.” Writes the Tribune: “You’re right, we can’t. In fact, we’re fairly certain that no one has ever tried.”
Anybody out there ever given or heard a unique excuse for getting out of jury duty? (I think I sense a future Interrogatory here…)
CARYN TAMBER, Legal Affairs Writer
Sphere: Related ContentOf jelly beans and bored jurors
January 16, 2008
Trial lawyer/jury consultant Anne Reed offers this tasty morsel for trial lawyers (and anyone else who feels duty-bound to repeat themselves): “The Jelly Bean theory of keeping jurors’ attention.”
“When you need jurors to understand new and complicated facts or concepts, you have a problem: you need to repeat the material more than once, but when you do, you’re punished for it,” the Milwaukee-based Reed posts on the blog of our sister paper, the Wisconsin Law Journal. “A new and seemingly unrelated study suggests a path between the rock and the hard place.”
In essence, study participants were asked to eat a jelly bean; actually, 22 jelly beans, one by one. Those who were asked to eat “a” jelly bean quickly got bored, but those who were asked to eat, say, a “cherry” jelly bean, followed by a “tangerine” jelly bean, then a peach or strawberry jelly bean, cleaned their plates and were ready for more.
The study’s author, Joseph P. Redden at the University of Minnesota, calls this “categorization.” Reed calls them “segments” and says: “Jurors think in segments anyway, so the simple act of dividing the material up will help them absorb it. If you label the segments too, they might even start looking forward to the parts of the trial where you’re the one standing up.”
If Reed is right, the devil may not be the only thing in the details. The key to your next win could be lurking there, as well.
BARBARA GRZINCIC, Managing Editor/Law
Sphere: Related Content-
Business
Business posts- UnderArmour to supply apparel for SEC
- The next Great Depression: How ya like them apples?
- It’s all for the kids
- Will CEG shareholders support EDF’s bid?
- Battle of the Beltway
- Any price is too high if you’re broke
- Maryland: 10th-fastest internet speeds in nation
- Where the deals are
- Phelps named Sportsman of the Year
- Can SUV sales make a comeback?
Law
Law posts- Tis’ the season for layoffs
- A case of mistaken identity
- Beware of the blogging juror
- Inmate sought to intervene in Wells Fargo suit
- What’s behind that law firm’s headcount?
- Law blog round-up
- This week in Maryland Lawyer
- A history of football in Baltimore, courtesy of a lawsuit
- Baltimore crime stuck at 12th-worst in U.S.
- First a mongrel Mercedes, now a botched Bentley
Recent Posts
- Tis’ the season for layoffs
- UnderArmour to supply apparel for SEC
- The next Great Depression: How ya like them apples?
- A case of mistaken identity
- It’s all for the kids
Recent Comments
- Jacki Pearlman: Unfortunately, the game will not live up to it’s hype. I am a diehard Redskins fan after being...
- Isolde: Anybody remember GreedyAssociates.com? That’s basically a forum for ads and political weirdos now. Why?...
- Liz Farmer: Thanks for chiming in guys. Ed, you are exactly right. I did not include this in my original post but...
- Rick Rigini: Did you ever read the children’s book Norman the Doorman?
- Ed Waters Jr.: In many articles, it seems the writers tend to overlook the fact that some people need an SUV (or...
On Commenting
We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.