Absolut PR nightmare
April 11, 2008
You might have heard about a recent ad by Absolut Vodka. I’ll let the AP explain:
“The campaign, which promotes ideal scenarios under the slogan ‘In an Absolut World,’ showed a 1830s-era map when Mexico included California, Texas and other southwestern states. Mexico still resents losing that territory in the 1848 Mexican-American War and the fight for Texas independence.”
The ad ran only in Mexico and — not that shockingly — stimulated a bit of American anger over immigration concerns with the U.S./Mexico border. Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) began a Web site calling for a boycott of Absolut. The company has since apologized and withdrawn the ad.
But the boycott lives on. SKYY Vodka, one of Absolut’s competitors, has — also not that shockingly — come out in favor of the boycott, drawing praise in a release from ALIPAC spokesman William Gheen.
“I like SKYY Vodka!”, said William Gheen. “It is great to be able to have an occasional martini without contributing to a Global corporation, like Absolut, that is encouraging the invasion of my nation.”
Personally, I think that would look great on a t-shirt or bumper sticker. I also love it when a modern company such as SKYY comes out in support of the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. (I’ve always wondered about Procter & Gamble’s opinion of the 1814 Treaty of Ghent.)
And here’s the point in the blog post where I admit looking at the ad and not understanding the fuss. “What a neat old map,” I thought. Didn’t even notice the immigration issue. Maybe it’s because I’m a gin guy.
What are your thoughts on the ad and the various responses to it?
JOE BACCHUS, Web Specialist
Sphere: Related ContentNo Sanctuary: What would Taney think?
January 11, 2008
The Taneytown City Council held a public hearing Wednesday night on a resolution that would declare the municipality “not a sanctuary city” for illegal immigrants. The council is expected to vote on the resolution Monday.
What would Taney — the former U.S. Supreme Court Justice who wrote the pro-slavery decision in the Dred Scott case — make of his eponymous town’s priorities? That illegal immigrants have no rights Americans are bound to respect?
BRENDAN KEARNEY, Legal Affairs Writer
Sphere: Related ContentLeft Behind?
August 30, 2007
Remember Ellen Sauerbrey?
Former minority leader of the Maryland House of Delegates, two-time unsuccessful Republican candidate for governor, former U.S. Representative to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, and now Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees, and Migration.
Sauerbrey was on CBS News’ “60 Minutes” last Sunday, explaining why the United States government has admitted so few Iraqis to America, even though the Iraqis are translators who assisted the U.S. military, and whose lives — and those of their families — have been threatened by insurgents who accuse them of “collaborating” with the enemy.
According to “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley, there are about 100,000 Iraqis who have worked for America. Add their families and the number climbs to perhaps half a million people at risk. And how many have been admitted so far? “About 100,” Pelley said.
Although the State Department has said it would consider 7,000 applications, and admit some 2,000 to 3,000 people this year, there has been very little progress, according to Pelley.
Sauerbrey, who is in charge of the State Department’s refugee program, said the problem is the “very thorough security checks” that the U.S. put in place after Sept. 11, 2001. “ … It takes a lot of time to work people through the security process,” she said.
But the translators have already been vetted by the U.S. armed forces. They’ve worked with Americans in very sensitive positions, and they were trusted. Now they feel “left behind.”
“60 Minutes” also reported that. according to Julia Taft, a former assistant secretary of state who headed the program that saw the admittance of Vietnamese refugees into this country after the U.S. withdrew from Vietnam, there were 131,000 people admitted to the United States over an eight-month period in 1975.
“President [Gerald R.] Ford said, ‘Let them come. Let’s help them. This is what we must do for them. They deserve it,’” Taft recalled. And communities all over the United States accepted the refugees.
“It was a huge enterprise. But it never would have worked had there not been the sustained commitment on the part of the administration working with Congress to make it happen,” Taft said.
Where is the determination on the part of the Bush administration and Congress to help people who have helped us?
Asked if she’s not seeing the kind of political will and leadership in this case that she dealt with in 1975, Taft, a lifelong Republican, replied, “I’m afraid that’s the case.”
-PAUL SAMUEL, Associate Editor
Sphere: Related Content-
Business
Business posts- Busted energy-related myths
- Giant has makeover, reveals new logo
- Survey shows mixed results for MedImmune
- Ye Olde Roland Park Country Club
- Lowering the stakes
- Harbor East construction update
- O’s fans outnumbered
- Free tickets!
- File under “Bad Customer Relations” for Ravens
- Another week, another crane collapse.
Law
Law postsRecent Posts
- The Big Picture
- Busted energy-related myths
- Giant has makeover, reveals new logo
- Survey shows mixed results for MedImmune
- The $1.5M wife
- Ye Olde Roland Park Country Club
Recent Comments
- Ronald Henry Pierce: Not proud of how we came together, but proud to have her. Want to read about the chld’s...
- vampire: ROFL - that Bruce, he sure has a way with words. Karma, dude.
- Any Given Tuesday: To the previous commenter, unless you’re paid to submit comments to blogs, I’m going...
- Caryn Tamber: You’re right; I should have credited the Romenesko media blog, which is where I read the story...
- curious: Either you read the Seattle Times on a regular basis (unlikely), or you read about Shakespear...