The FCC’s $550,000 malfunction
July 21, 2008
I could go a lot of ways with news that a federal appeals court has thrown out the $550,000 fine leveled by the Federal Communications Commission against CBS for Janet Jackson’s infamous “wardrobe malfunction” during the Super Bowl halftime show four years ago. (Quick aside: can you believe that was just four years ago? It feels more like 40 in the age of TMZ and leaked-sex-tape-as-career-advancer.)
But I’m going to stick with part of the case synopsis written by Chief Judge Anthony J. Scirica of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the opinion released today, on the theory that straightforward descriptions are better (and in many cases more entertaining) than prose:
The halftime show featured a variety of musical performances by contemporary recording artists, with Janet Jackson as the announced headlining act and Justin Timberlake as a “surprise guest” for the final minutes of the show. … He and Jackson performed his popular song ‘Rock Your Body’ as the show’s finale. …The performance ended with Timberlake singing, ‘gonna have you naked by the end of this song,’ and simultaneously tearing away part of Jackson’s bustier. … As a result, Jackson’s bare right breast was exposed on camera for nine-sixteenths of one second.
Scirica noted the exposure “caused a sensation,” which is probably an understatement. But he ruled the FCC’s response was an invalid departure from prior policy and unenforceable against CBS, calling the agency’s actions “arbitrary and capricious.”
I hope the appeals court ruling means our nine-sixteenths-of-a-second national nipple nightmare is finally over.
DANNY JACOBS, Legal Affairs Writer
Sphere: Related ContentFourth circuit settles canine couture fight
November 14, 2007
Score one for the little guy (or pooch).
A panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a ruling today that kept Las Vegas-based Haute Diggity Dog and Ashburn, Va.-based Woofie’s Pet Boutique in business.
Luxury handbag maker Louis Vuitton had claimed Haute infringed on its trademark with “Chewy Vuiton” dog toys, but – as the AP puts it – the court “refused to bite.”
The AP reports:
Judge Paul V. Niemeyer found that Chewy Vuiton is “a joking and amusing parody” that “pokes fun at the elegance and expensiveness of a LOUIS VUITTON handbag.”
Read the full opinion here. (PDF)
And take note of some of Haute’s other parodies: Chewnel perfume and The Bark Street Journal.
-JACKIE SAUTER, Multimedia Editor
Sphere: Related Content-
Business
Business postsLaw
Law postsRecent Posts
- In the market for a (used) car?
- DNA: What are the odds?
- Three Restaurant Weeks ahead
- Can the city support an NBA or NHL team?
- What’s in a name?
- A foot-stompin’ good time
Recent Comments
- Anonymous: Yes - Harry Johnson!
- Jeff: Of course it can’t. NBA ticket prices are outrageous, and the NHL isn’t any better. (Plus, it...
- Publicus: No.
- Aequitas: There are certainly many types of cases where some (but not necessarily all) people would...
- Anonymous: I think the recent rise in wine festivals is due to ever-increasing alcohol abuse. For some reason,...