‘Generally happy’ with billable training

September 2, 2008

I can name only a few young lawyers who say they are happy practicing law. Mostly I hear complaints about long hours, little feedback, monotonous work and a constant pressure to meet billable hours.

Which is why I think they would jump at the chance to work for a firm where they can proudly exclaim “I am generally happy.”

One Atlanta-based firm has apparently found a way to make its associates’ lives, well, less miserable.

About a year after doing away with strict billable requirements for first-year associates, Ford & Harrison has deemed the move a success — and so have its first-years. (Hat tip: The Wall Street Journal law blog, summarizing the subscriber-only follow-up story in the National Law Journal (subscriber-only))

Ford & Harrison associates are required to “bill” 1,900 hours. But these hours can either be billable to clients or can be time spent training:

Jessica Walberg, a first-year associate in the firm’s Orlando office, said that she has had the opportunity to sit in on depositions, arbitrations, negotiations and mediations while law school friends at other firms are toiling on research projects and document review. Said Walberg to the NLJ: “This is great — [doing this] instead of working on this or that research project and never seeing the big picture, like my buddies working at other firms. I would say they are generally unhappy and I am generally happy.”

And, in a “pleasant surprise” for the employment-law firm, the story says that once the pressure to meet billable hours was off, the associates actually billed more. (Presumably, in the billable-to-clients category.)

Do you think firms in Maryland should make the switch?

CHRISTINA DORAN, Assistant Legal Editor

Sphere: Related Content

Comments

One Response to “‘Generally happy’ with billable training”

  1. Russell D. McGeorge on September 2nd, 2008 1:50 pm

    Don’t they still feel pressured to meet what they know to be the recent standard? If I were in their shoes I think I would still feel compelled to meet the client-billable hours goal. If they are any happier in their job, then I suspect it has more to do with the opportunities to learn and gain other experience being added, not the hours expectation being subtracted.

Got something to say?





  • Law

  • Business

  • Archives

  • Visit Eye on Annapolis

    Check out our blog on the legislative session, Eye on Annapolis.
  • Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Lou Fritz: Robbie Whelan’s, There Stands Brody Like A Stonewall, is typical of journalists who are long on...
  • Donald S. Smith: I find it interesting that those who claim to love freedom the most are sometimes the quickest to...
  • Steve: Robbie, Your ignorance is deafening.
  • Rich Barnett: Are you really able to write this story and end it with “one of the state’s most...
  • Winger: Well, let’s look at a list: 1.) Baltimore is situated below the Mason / Dixon line. 2.) The battery on...

On Commenting

We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.

Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.