This week in Maryland Lawyer

August 18, 2008

08_18_mlcoverblog.jpgGood lawyers don’t try their cases in the court of public opinion — or do they? For Paul Kemp, who represented anthrax researcher Bruce Ivins before Ivins’ fatal drug overdose, a trial in the press was the only trial his client was going to get. Danny Jacobs talks to Kemp and other attorneys about handling high-profile cases.

A double-murder trial in Rockville this month pitted Montgomery County’s top prosecutor against the defendant himself – a man who had been deemed fit to stand trial for the 2002 slayings just last year. As Steve Lash writes, pro se defendants put an extra strain on an adversarial system that assumes each side has a trained advocate.

Also:

A suspected drug dealer will get $35,000 from the city of Baltimore because the search of his private parts was conducted in too-public an area. Also in Verdicts & Settlements, a drywall installer who fell on the job lost his lawsuit, but thanks to a pretrial high-low agreement, will recover $29,050 from the two defendants.

In the news, some law firms are looking long and hard at whether they need to keep their paid listings in Martindale-Hubbell; criminal defense attorneys weigh in on a case of nondisclosure; the CSA blesses Warren Brown’s defense strategy in the UMCP homecoming stabbing trial; and an Indian firm responds to a Bethesda-based lawyer’s lawsuit against the practice of overseas outsourcing. (According to one report, the motion to dismiss was written entirely by — you guessed it — Indian lawyers.)

PLUS:

Profiles in Leadership, this week featuring Steve Sachs; a column by Joe Surkiewicz on the Allegany Bar Foundation; the Interrogatory; On the Move; Legal Briefs; and the Law Digest, including cases from the 4th Circuit and Maryland’s federal courts.

As always, we welcome your comments.

BARBARA GRZINCIC, Managing Editor/Law

Sphere: Related Content

Comments

Got something to say?





  • Law

  • Business

  • Archives

  • Visit Eye on Annapolis

    Check out our blog on the legislative session, Eye on Annapolis.
  • Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Jacki Pearlman: Unfortunately, the game will not live up to it’s hype. I am a diehard Redskins fan after being...
  • Isolde: Anybody remember GreedyAssociates.com? That’s basically a forum for ads and political weirdos now. Why?...
  • Liz Farmer: Thanks for chiming in guys. Ed, you are exactly right. I did not include this in my original post but...
  • Rick Rigini: Did you ever read the children’s book Norman the Doorman?
  • Ed Waters Jr.: In many articles, it seems the writers tend to overlook the fact that some people need an SUV (or...

On Commenting

We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.

Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.