Mind the unmentionables gap

July 22, 2008

Retired Judge Dale Cathell would be so pleased. The ACLU, not so much.

In a (no pun intended) crackdown on low-slung waistbands, the Chicago suburb of Lynwood, Ill., has decided to impose a $25 fine on anyone who exposes more than 3” of underwear. The town of Riviera Beach, Fla., passed a similar law but upped the ante to $150.

Lynwood’s mayor says the ordinance is needed to spur development — to prove, he says, that the town is worth investing in. An ACLU spokesman said the group was concerned the ordinance was targeting “young men of color.” In a shocking bit of stereotyping by livelihood, he added, “Let’s see if they start pulling over plumbers for their pants.”

Closer to home, I don’t know if Cathell would back a monetary fine on baggy pants, but in a dissent last year to a search and seizure case, he suggested a far higher price tag for that particular fashion statement.

“If a person wants to have an expectation of privacy in that area of his or her body,” Cathell wrote in Paulino v. State (PDF), “he or she should keep their pants up when in public.”

BARBARA GRZINCIC, Managing Editor/Law

Sphere: Related Content

Comments

Got something to say?





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Ronald Henry Pierce: Not proud of how we came together, but proud to have her. Want to read about the chld’s...
  • vampire: ROFL - that Bruce, he sure has a way with words. Karma, dude.
  • Any Given Tuesday: To the previous commenter, unless you’re paid to submit comments to blogs, I’m going...
  • Caryn Tamber: You’re right; I should have credited the Romenesko media blog, which is where I read the story...
  • curious: Either you read the Seattle Times on a regular basis (unlikely), or you read about Shakespear...