<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How does your judge stack up?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/07/08/how-does-your-judge-stack-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/07/08/how-does-your-judge-stack-up/#comment-8275</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/07/08/how-does-your-judge-stack-up/#comment-8275</guid>
		<description>This is a very healthy development given the insular nature of judging. But, if it's anything like "RateMyProfessors.com" it will attract the extremes on both sides--those who love a judge and those who hate him/her. Such postings may lead to a more systematic way of evaluating judicial performance and that would be a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very healthy development given the insular nature of judging. But, if it&#8217;s anything like &#8220;RateMyProfessors.com&#8221; it will attract the extremes on both sides&#8211;those who love a judge and those who hate him/her. Such postings may lead to a more systematic way of evaluating judicial performance and that would be a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
