Law blog round-up

May 27, 2008

Good morning, and welcome back from the long (though not long enough, naturally) holiday weekend.  Here’s what’s new around the Web today:

  • The AmLaw Daily suggests a novel approach to getting more female partners.
  • Above the Law links to Legal Blog Watch, which posts about a survey in Las Vegas in which attorneys rated male judges higher than female judges on “courteousness.” The Las Vegas Review-Journal story says that two-thirds of the survey respondents were males, and that people tend to identify with those who are like them. I would also suggest that men sometimes perceive assertive women (as presumably these judges are, having advanced so far in their legal careers) as rude or domineering. (Ahem, Hillary Clinton.) Also, women in power sometimes have to bend over backwards to be taken seriously, which means that, yes, female judges may smile and joke a little less in the courtroom.
  • Should a law clerk who wants to open a solo practice go first to a big law firm to take advantage of the $50,000 clerkship bonus? Carolyn Elefant offers some advice.

CARYN TAMBER, Legal Affairs Writer

Sphere: Related Content

Comments

Got something to say?





  • Law

  • Business

  • Archives

  • Visit Eye on Annapolis

    Check out our blog on the legislative session, Eye on Annapolis.
  • Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Jacki Pearlman: Unfortunately, the game will not live up to it’s hype. I am a diehard Redskins fan after being...
  • Isolde: Anybody remember GreedyAssociates.com? That’s basically a forum for ads and political weirdos now. Why?...
  • Liz Farmer: Thanks for chiming in guys. Ed, you are exactly right. I did not include this in my original post but...
  • Rick Rigini: Did you ever read the children’s book Norman the Doorman?
  • Ed Waters Jr.: In many articles, it seems the writers tend to overlook the fact that some people need an SUV (or...

On Commenting

We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.

Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.