Prospective Kelly jurors say the darndest things

May 16, 2008

r-kelly.jpgThe Chicago Tribune ran a story the other day on jury selection in the R. Kelly child pornography trial, cataloguing the reasons why prospective jurors were not picked. Among the highlights:

  • Two people (the reporter doesn’t say what gender they were, but shall we guess?) opined that if they were in charge, they would lower the age of consent. One said that “nature” already has an age of consent: “puberty.”
  • One lady proclaimed Kelly a “musical genius.”
  • One man said, “R. Kelly may have led the Taliban in attacking us on 9-11, but you can’t prove it.” Writes the Tribune: “You’re right, we can’t. In fact, we’re fairly certain that no one has ever tried.”

Anybody out there ever given or heard a unique excuse for getting out of jury duty? (I think I sense a future Interrogatory here…)

CARYN TAMBER, Legal Affairs Writer

Sphere: Related Content

Comments

Got something to say?





Business

The business staff of The Daily Record newspaper will contribute to this section. We'll write about topics ranging from the workplace to energy to the environment, but we'll strive to keep it as local as possible.

RSS Business posts

Law

The Daily Record’s been Maryland’s legal newspaper for 120 years or so. Now, we want to be Maryland’s legal blog, too. Click here to join the discussion and read posts by our legal team, including our Monday law blog round-up.

RSS Law posts

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Anonymous: Yes - Harry Johnson!
  • Jeff: Of course it can’t. NBA ticket prices are outrageous, and the NHL isn’t any better. (Plus, it...
  • Publicus: No.
  • Aequitas: There are certainly many types of cases where some (but not necessarily all) people would...
  • Anonymous: I think the recent rise in wine festivals is due to ever-increasing alcohol abuse. For some reason,...