Fire the fiancé?

April 21, 2008

An employer can’t fire a worker for filing a discrimination charge, but is her fiancé fair game?

Our biweekly sister paper, Lawyers USA, has an article on the 6th Circuit’s decision on that point in Thompson v. North American Stainless, No. 07-5040.

By a 2-1 vote, the 6th Circuit reinstated a Title VII retaliation suit brought by a man who was fired after his fiancée filed a gender discrimination charge with the EEOC. The appellate decision (PDF) apparently creates a split among the federal circuits — the dissenting judge called the holding a first and cited the 3rd, 5th and 8th Circuits as having held to the contrary, the article notes.

A federal judge in Kentucky had granted summary judgment for the employer, which claims the man was fired over performance issues.

Reversing, the 6th Circuit acknowledged that a “literal reading” of the anti-retaliation law suggests that it applies only to employees who engage in protected activity. However, the appellate court said, “such a reading … ‘defeats the plain purpose’ of Title VII. There is no doubt that an employer’s retaliation against a family member after an employee files an EEOC charge would, under [Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White], dissuade ‘reasonable workers’ from such an action.”

What do you think? And what chances would you give an “associational retaliation” claim here in the 4th Circuit?

BARBARA GRZINCIC, Managing Editor/Law

Sphere: Related Content

Comments

Got something to say?





Law

The Daily Record’s been Maryland’s legal newspaper for 120 years or so. Now, we want to be Maryland’s legal blog, too. Click here to join the discussion and read posts by our legal team, including our Monday law blog round-up.

RSS Law posts

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Tim: The kid was wrong! He either was not taught to respect others especially those in authority or he has rebelled...
  • Richard Simon: If you would like to see a live video feed from Technite at the Baltimore Convention Center, go to...
  • Kim: A typical root canal with a specialist will usually run a human from $1000 to $2000.
  • publicus: Of course Congress should pass such a law. Without it, the freedom of speech in every country would be...
  • neil helfrich: Barbara, Dana is Dan Moylan’s daughter not Charles Moylan”s daughter. BTW, the theory does...

On Commenting

We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.

Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.