<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The age of constitutional senility</title>
	<link>http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/04/08/the-age-of-constitutional-senility/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Miller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/04/08/the-age-of-constitutional-senility/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.mddailyrecord.com/ontherecord/2008/04/08/the-age-of-constitutional-senility/#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>As I've written before, mandatory retirement at 70 for judges is outdated.  Fortunately, it seems that everyone who wants to finds a way to continue to sit after mandatory retirement.  But it is time to amend the constitution, at least with respect to judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve written before, mandatory retirement at 70 for judges is outdated.  Fortunately, it seems that everyone who wants to finds a way to continue to sit after mandatory retirement.  But it is time to amend the constitution, at least with respect to judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
