Is your password protected under the Fifth Amendment?
January 16, 2008
Today’s WaPo tells the tale of Sebastien Boucher, suspected of possessing child pornography on his laptop computer. The government has the computer, but Boucher is the only one with the password to un-encrypt the files — and he’s not talking. Boucher is not even sure he knows what the password is, but he’s downright certain of one thing: the Fifth Amendment protects his right not to incriminate himself by divulging it.
A U.S. Magistrate Judge in Vermont agreed, saying that Boucher “would be faced with the forbidden trilemma: incriminate himself, lie under oath, or find himself in contempt of court.”
While the Justice Department seeks to have the ruling overturned, the war of words is underway on the electronic frontier.
Mark Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told the Post that the ruling simply means the government needs to find another way to get the information. (Right now, prosecutors are trying a random-password generator, which they say could take years).
“But that’s as it should be,” Rotenberg says in the article. “That’s what the Fifth Amendment is intended to protect.”
But Mark D. Rasch, a privacy and technology expert with FTI Consulting, thinks the ruling is “dangerous” for law enforcement. “If it stands, it means that if you encrypt your documents, the government cannot force you to decrypt them,” Rasch told the Post. “So you’re going to see drug dealers and pedophiles encrypting their documents, secure in the knowledge that the police can’t get at them.”
What do you think?
BARBARA GRZINCIC, Managing Editor/Law
Sphere: Related ContentComments
One Response to “Is your password protected under the Fifth Amendment?”
Got something to say?
-
Business
Business posts- UnderArmour to supply apparel for SEC
- The next Great Depression: How ya like them apples?
- It’s all for the kids
- Will CEG shareholders support EDF’s bid?
- Battle of the Beltway
- Any price is too high if you’re broke
- Maryland: 10th-fastest internet speeds in nation
- Where the deals are
- Phelps named Sportsman of the Year
- Can SUV sales make a comeback?
Law
Law posts- A case of mistaken identity
- Beware of the blogging juror
- Inmate sought to intervene in Wells Fargo suit
- What’s behind that law firm’s headcount?
- Law blog round-up
- This week in Maryland Lawyer
- A history of football in Baltimore, courtesy of a lawsuit
- Baltimore crime stuck at 12th-worst in U.S.
- First a mongrel Mercedes, now a botched Bentley
- Law blog round-up
Recent Posts
- UnderArmour to supply apparel for SEC
- The next Great Depression: How ya like them apples?
- A case of mistaken identity
- It’s all for the kids
- Will CEG shareholders support EDF’s bid?
Recent Comments
- Jacki Pearlman: Unfortunately, the game will not live up to it’s hype. I am a diehard Redskins fan after being...
- Isolde: Anybody remember GreedyAssociates.com? That’s basically a forum for ads and political weirdos now. Why?...
- Liz Farmer: Thanks for chiming in guys. Ed, you are exactly right. I did not include this in my original post but...
- Rick Rigini: Did you ever read the children’s book Norman the Doorman?
- Ed Waters Jr.: In many articles, it seems the writers tend to overlook the fact that some people need an SUV (or...
On Commenting
We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.
I refuse to comment on the grounds I might incriminate myself