Couple decides to raffle Hagerstown home
December 31, 2007
How’s this for a housing slump story?
After their four-bedroom farmhouse sat on the market for a year and a half, a Hagerstown couple has decided to take a gamble: they’re selling raffle tickets in a joint effort with a local charity with the grand prize being their home.
The raffle offers five prizes, several donated by local merchants: the home to the grand prize winner; a 2008 Toyota Camry; a Persian rug; furniture; and $1,000 cash, reports the Hagerstown Herald-Mail.
The winners will be drawn at an annual dinner for the San Mar Children’s Home in Boonsboro, which will receive any extra money raised through raffle sales.
The farmhouse was listed at $425,000 in 2006; it’s now valued at $390,000.
JACKIE SAUTER, Multimedia Editor
Sphere: Related ContentPosted by Jackie Sauter | Filed Under maryland, real estate
Comments
7 Responses to “Couple decides to raffle Hagerstown home”
Got something to say?
Law
Business
-
Archives
Visit Eye on Annapolis
Check out our blog on the legislative session, Eye on Annapolis.Categories
- 4th Circuit (4)
- 6th Circuit (2)
- advertising (9)
- agriculture (4)
- airlines (6)
- alcohol (6)
- annapolis (6)
- attorney general (5)
- attorney grievance commission (2)
- Ballard Spahr (2)
- Baltimore (103)
- baltimore county (11)
- baltimore sun (5)
- bankruptcy (2)
- Barack Obama (2)
- baseball (7)
- Bethesda (2)
- Billy Murphy (2)
- Bloomberg (1)
- Board of Estimates (1)
- bonds (1)
- BRAC (4)
- business (389)
- energy (20)
- BWI airport (3)
- cars (9)
- charity (4)
- Charles Street trolley (1)
- college (1)
- comcast (1)
- commute (3)
- Constellation Energy (2)
- construction (3)
- copyright (2)
- court of appeals (17)
- court of special appeals (8)
- crabs (1)
- crime (10)
- d.c. (2)
- D.C. Circuit (1)
- Dale Cathell (1)
- death penalty (3)
- delaware (1)
- development (5)
- disclosure (1)
- discovery communications (5)
- district court (2)
- DLA Piper (4)
- DNA (3)
- Eastern Shore (5)
- economy (7)
- education (13)
- ehrlich (1)
- entertainment (11)
- environment (24)
- estate planning (2)
- executive compensation (2)
- expert testimony (1)
- fashion (2)
- Federal Hill (1)
- fifth amendment (1)
- film (3)
- finance (9)
- first amendment (2)
- food (12)
- foreclosure (1)
- foreclosures (7)
- frederick (4)
- gambling (4)
- gasoline (1)
- general assembly (1)
- golf (7)
- government (74)
- guns (1)
- harbor east (1)
- hate crime (1)
- health (43)
- hilton (1)
- holidays (14)
- homeless (1)
- Honest Tea (4)
- hotels (4)
- howard county (8)
- immigration (3)
- internet (3)
- iPhone (1)
- iraq (2)
- johns hopkins (10)
- judges (3)
- jurors (2)
- KFC (1)
- law (435)
- law school (9)
- living wage (1)
- Loyola (4)
- marketing (13)
- Marriott (2)
- Martin O'Malley (2)
- maryland (84)
- maryland lawyer (1)
- Maryland Stadium Authority (1)
- maryland state lottery (1)
- michael phelps (1)
- Miles & Stockbridge (1)
- military (5)
- minorities (1)
- money (8)
- montgomery county (21)
- Mount St. Mary's (1)
- MSBA (3)
- multimedia (24)
- music (1)
- national harbor (1)
- news (1)
- newspapers (2)
- nonprofit (3)
- nuns (1)
- Olympics (1)
- Orioles (14)
- Perdue Farms (1)
- peter angelos (2)
- pets (15)
- Philadelphia (1)
- photography (1)
- politics (31)
- port (1)
- prince george's county (1)
- PSC (1)
- public relations (4)
- radio (2)
- Ravens (17)
- real estate (44)
- recession (2)
- recruiting (3)
- regulation (2)
- religion (4)
- restaurants (6)
- retail (4)
- Rupert Murdoch (2)
- salaries (5)
- salisbury (1)
- same-sex marriage (2)
- settlement (1)
- sheila dixon (2)
- slots (5)
- small business (3)
- smoking (3)
- smoking ban (3)
- sparrows point (1)
- sports (67)
- starbucks (1)
- state fair (1)
- stem cells (1)
- steroids (3)
- stocks (2)
- Supreme Court (24)
- surveys (1)
- T. Rowe Price (1)
- taxes (27)
- technology (36)
- The Daily Record (1)
- The Wire (9)
- tourism (9)
- Towson (3)
- Towson University (3)
- trademark (1)
- training (2)
- transit (4)
- travel (9)
- u.s. district court (1)
- Uncategorized (75)
- UnderArmour (6)
- United Nations (1)
- University of Baltimore (7)
- university of maryland (18)
- university of maryland-baltimore (3)
- urban planning (1)
- Venable (2)
- Villa Julie (3)
- virginia (4)
- Wall Street Journal (4)
- washington (9)
- washington post (3)
- WBAL (1)
- Westboro Baptist Church (2)
- wildlife (4)
- WJZ-TV (1)
- WMD (2)
- women (2)
- work (13)
- youth (4)
Business
The business staff of The Daily Record newspaper will contribute to this section. We'll write about topics ranging from the workplace to energy to the environment, but we'll strive to keep it as local as possible.
Business postsLaw
The Daily Record’s been Maryland’s legal newspaper for 120 years or so. Now, we want to be Maryland’s legal blog, too. Click here to join the discussion and read posts by our legal team, including our Monday law blog round-up.
Law posts- Garrett closer to getting a judge
- Can’t do the canned food drive
- Is Harrell the new Cathell?
- Uphill climb for gas-leak plaintiffs
- This week in Maryland Lawyer
- ‘Generally happy’ with billable training
- Law blog round-up
- Possible Enzyte trouble for Venable?
- Eiswert, Sherbin seek Garrett bench seat
- Blogger arrested for leaking songs
Recent Posts
- Bowie Baysox made the playoffs - if anyone noticed
- Garrett closer to getting a judge
- Wound up about design
- Loyola gets a nod for its tech offerings
Recent Comments
- Russell D. McGeorge: Don’t they still feel pressured to meet what they know to be the recent standard? If I...
- BeagleMom: I truly think it depends on each individuals situation and financial stability. With the economy...
- Kathleen Cook: Jeff is right. Not a proud moment. This one is doubly not proud. As the $1.5 mill wife, I was not an...
- Ginger Wassum: I was another unfortunate person who was traveling from another state on a quiet Sunday morning to...
- tfr: Yes. I have seen a deer in the City. Foxes too.
On Commenting
We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.
Copyright © 2008 On the Record
All rights reserved.
Is this really a housing slump story or a bad decision story? They purchased the house in April 2006 for $375K. According to the main article, they put it on the market 18 months ago (so around June 2006) for $425K after deciding it wasn’t for them. It seems hard to believe that failing to make a $50K profit after being in a house for 2 months is indicative of a housing slump.
But, hey, good for the charity. Hopefully, it’ll earn some money from the raffle.
Because I wanted to see if I could even afford to pay the taxes on winning the house if I entered the raffle, I did a little research: as far as I can see,they are flippers who flopped and at the time they took it off the market, they were asking 349,900.l They are delaying the start of the raffle enough that I wonder if they really intend to raffle it.
The story is that San Mar has the opportunity to gain a significant amount to support its programs, and someone will have the opportunity of winning a home appraised at $390,000. And there are four additional chances to win. Runner-up prizes–a 2008 Toyota Camry, a Persian Rug, Statton furniture, $1,000 cash. Tickets can be ordered at www.sanmarraffle.com, where website visitors can also take a virtual tour of the home. A minimum of 5,000 tickets must be sold. The maximum number to be sold is 7,000.
why cant the home owners keep any profit?
If the couple lowered the asking price to $349,000 before taking it off the market and the house is appraised at $390,000 why are they getting paid $425,000 from the raffle ticket sales? If enough tickets aren’t sold the San Mar doesn’t make any money. The home owners should be willing to take at least the appraised value so San Mar can receive more…..San Mar is the charity after all.
I wonder what the taxes would be to the winner of the home? The winning ticket holder may not be able to afford to win the home.
The homeowners don’t keep the profit due to Maryland law prohibiting anyone other than a registered charity from benefiting from a raffle. Prize taxes range from 25 to 38% of the prize and are payable upon receipt of any prize of $5000 or more - as per IRS. In the case of this raffle taxes could be as much as $150,000. However, the law also requires that another appraisal must be completed if the raffle drawing is held 90 days after the issuing of the permit. The drawing is on March 13 if 5000 tickets are sold so another appraisal is due. The first appraisal valued the property at $390,000.
To date there are just under 4700 tickets sold.