Chances are, you’ve been re-gifted
December 18, 2007
Thursday is National Re-gifting Day (at least, according to Money Management International). After polling more than 1,000, MMI has drawn some conclusions about who you’re likely to re-gift and why.
1. Today, the majority of people (62 percent) say they re-gift because they think the gift is something the recipient would actually like. In 2005, just over half of respondents made that claim.
2. More than 4 in 10 people say they regift to save money - up from 33 percent in 2005.
3. 41 percent of re-gifters said coworkers were the recipients of their re-gifts (that’s right… the person sitting next to you). Only 12 percent of people said they re-gifted something for their significant other.
Alright, so we’ve realized maybe re-gifting isn’t the worst thing in the world. Curious about the etiquette? U.S. News & World Report says to make sure the gift is new, re-gifted to a different social circle than the one it came from, and most importantly: it will be liked.
Received a present that you don’t like? You can always host a re-gifting party (aka a White Elephant exchange) or “freecycle” it to people in your neighborhood.
JACKIE SAUTER, Multimedia Editor
Sphere: Related ContentComments
Got something to say?
-
Business
Business posts- UnderArmour to supply apparel for SEC
- The next Great Depression: How ya like them apples?
- It’s all for the kids
- Will CEG shareholders support EDF’s bid?
- Battle of the Beltway
- Any price is too high if you’re broke
- Maryland: 10th-fastest internet speeds in nation
- Where the deals are
- Phelps named Sportsman of the Year
- Can SUV sales make a comeback?
Law
Law posts- A case of mistaken identity
- Beware of the blogging juror
- Inmate sought to intervene in Wells Fargo suit
- What’s behind that law firm’s headcount?
- Law blog round-up
- This week in Maryland Lawyer
- A history of football in Baltimore, courtesy of a lawsuit
- Baltimore crime stuck at 12th-worst in U.S.
- First a mongrel Mercedes, now a botched Bentley
- Law blog round-up
Recent Posts
- UnderArmour to supply apparel for SEC
- The next Great Depression: How ya like them apples?
- A case of mistaken identity
- It’s all for the kids
- Will CEG shareholders support EDF’s bid?
Recent Comments
- Jacki Pearlman: Unfortunately, the game will not live up to it’s hype. I am a diehard Redskins fan after being...
- Isolde: Anybody remember GreedyAssociates.com? That’s basically a forum for ads and political weirdos now. Why?...
- Liz Farmer: Thanks for chiming in guys. Ed, you are exactly right. I did not include this in my original post but...
- Rick Rigini: Did you ever read the children’s book Norman the Doorman?
- Ed Waters Jr.: In many articles, it seems the writers tend to overlook the fact that some people need an SUV (or...
On Commenting
We ask that our readers follow a few guidelines, noted below.Please do not post any personal attacks, profanity, spam or other advertisements — they will be removed. Also, please post using only one name or pseudonym, as this consistency helps establish a sense of community. We will delete posts if they are signed with different names but originate from the same IP or email address. And if you’re going to comment using a proper name, please make it your own. Deliberate misrepresentations will be removed.