The Senate Finance Committee resolved a brouhaha over energy efficiency programs late Wednesday, directing some money from the sale of greenhouse gas emission credits toward programs to cut power use, and sending some back to ratepayers to reduce bills.
A bill that creates a “Strategic Energy Investment Fund” originally would have sent money to the Maryland Energy Administration to help renters and low income electric customers reduce their power use. That money would come from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a multi-state compact that would see Maryland sell carbon allowances to power plants.
But Eastern Shore Republican E.J. Pipkin passed a committee amendment Tuesday that would have sent the money directly back to ratepayers. At the last second, Sen. Rob Garagiola, a Montgomery Democrat, succeeded in suspending the discussion. Environmental groups cried foul, and on Wednesday, the committee agreed to split the difference between bill credits and efficiency programs.
One Senate estimate projects that the combined programs could save residential ratepayers around $9.35 per month. The credits were projected in the $5 range, but the efficiency programs may take longer to phase in.
So what’s better? Spending on efficiency programs or sending it all back to ratepayers? Or do you like the combo?
